- Division
of nucleus was complete & vaccum was released
by releasing footswitch to zero or vent is on. The
time from preset vaccum reached to the vent on was
measured. This was termed as cleavage time. When
all these sequelae are happening, it will be said
that the nucleus was divided in one stroke
- Division
of nucleus is incomplete & vaccum is released
by releasing footswitch to zero or vent is on.
- One
stroke means events taking place from phaco on till
vent on; irrespective of whether the nuclear division
has occurred successfully or not.
Time
from preset vaccum reached to vent on is measured
for first stroke. The nucleus is then rotated through
1800 & same procedure repeated. Time for second
stroke noted in similar manner. The procedure was
repeated till nuclear division was complete. This
may require three or even four strokes. As mentioned
earlier, time required for each stroke ( from preset
vaccum to vent on ) is termed as cleavage time.
Sum of all cleavage time will give aggregate cleavage
time per division. ( Time required to get complete
division of nucleus ).
The
effective phaco Time per division was time from
starting phaco till division of nucleus (noted in
effective phaco time counter of phaco machine).
It was separately measured every time for e.g. time
for division of nucleus into two pieces, then into
three pieces & then into four pieces.
In
each group, aggregate effective phaco time per division
required in all cases for first division of nucleus
was obtained by making a sum of all the values.
Similarly aggregate effective phaco time per division
for second & third division was also calculated
by adding the individual effective phaco time obtained
in each case.
RESULTS
:
90 Eyes with
grade III & grade IV nuclei of senile cataract were
studied & results noted down in the charts.
| Group |
No Of Eyes |
Grade Of Nucleus |
Aggregate Number of Strokes |
Aggregate Effective Phaco
Time per division(seconds) |
Aggregate Cleavage Time (Seconds) |
Group A
(Chop Technique) |
45 |
III |
IV |
292 |
1st |
2nd |
3rd |
1st |
2nd |
3rd |
| 41 |
4 |
131 |
96 |
94 |
131 |
96 |
94 |
Group B
(Woodcutter's Technique ) |
45 |
41 |
4 |
153 |
90 |
59 |
59 |
490 |
490 |
125 |
No
significant complications were noticed in any of group
& by either of procedure. Complications occurring
after division of nucleus into four fragments were not
related to the study & hence not considered.
DISCUSSION
:
Dividing
nucleus into four fragments is the most difficult thing
to learn & master in phaco. Karate chop technique
is considered to be the best in today's scenario ; for
grade III & IV nuclei. Chop technique however requires
many strokes & longer time. New woodcutter's technique
was discovered to overcome this problem.Observations
were subjected to statistical analysis , applying "t''
test.
Results
are shown in table 2.
| Parameter |
Group A
(Chop Technique) |
Group B
(Woodcutter's Technique) |
t Value |
p
Value |
| No. of Strokes. |
No. of Strokes. |
3.4 |
6.1128 |
P<0.001 |
| Effective PhacoTime (Sec.) |
2.06 |
1.31 |
5.5397 |
P<0.001 |
CleavageTime
(Sec.) |
5.22 |
2.777 |
6.0545 |
P<0.001 |
In
the present study, it was noticed that number of strokes
required to divide nuclei of grade III & IV, are
very less in woodcutter's new technique & the difference
is statistically highly significant having p value <
0.001. Because of this the surgeon need not rotate the
nucleus repeatedly, which has an added advantage of
having less stretch on zonules. On the contrary there
is more stretch on zonules in karate chop technique.
When the number of strokes are less, you are quite away
from posterior capsule while dividing nucleus. Multiple
strokes means you are going deeper & closer to the
posterior capsule.
The
effective phaco time per division of nucleus is also
less & statistically highly significant with p value
< 0.001. The advantages are obvious.
Cleavage
time per division is also comparatively quite less in
woodcutter's technique & again statistically highly
significant ( p value 0.001). No significant complications
occurred in any of these techniques.
CONCLUSION
:
This comparative
study shows that New woodcutter's technique requires
less Effective phaco Time, cleavage time as well as
less number of strokes. Division of nucleus is quicker
& easier with woodcutter's new technique than in
established chopping technique.
|